1. Results All the implantation of IVC filter and embolectomy were successful.

2. Subsequent embolectomy followed by fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions prevented further thromboembolism.

3. After hepatectomy with embolectomy and biliary duct drainage, the survival time was 5-46 months and the survival median time was 23.5 months.

4. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of pulmonary embolectomy by catheter for the treatment of acute massive pulmonary embolism .

5. ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcome of Fogarty catheter embolectomy and non-surgical treatment for acute arterial embolism of upper extremity.

6. Conclusion:Fogarty catheter embolectomy was adequate to the acute arterial embolism, and acute thrombosis of lower extremity should be treated by thrombolysis or PTA.

7. Method:The preoperative state, operative programs and method of anesthesia were studied in 5 cases of embolectomy of massive pulmonary artery embolism.

8. Massive pulmonary embolism resulting in shock is treated with thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy.

9. The author reported the nursing cooperation in 31 cases with femoral artery embolectomy by blocker catheter.

10. Two patients succumbed to subarachnoid hemorrhage during follow up(mean 21.8 months). One case suffered from thromboembolism of right femoral artery and was cured by embolectomy.

11. Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of implantation of inferior vena cava (IVC)filter under the guidance of color Doppler ultrasound and embolectomy for acute deep vein thrombosis.

12. Conclusions For acute arterial ischemia of the lower extremity,() emergency arteriotomy of femoral artery plus embolectomy is the treatment of choice.

13. We present a patient with spontaneous femoral artery thrombosis that recurred after successful embolectomy and anticoagulant therapy.

14. Conclusion Curative effect is notable for DVT after implantation of caval vein filter before embolectomy or thrombolysis.

15. Grouped according to the wishes of the patients:25 cases of fogarty catheter embolectomy, 16 cases of non-surgical treatment, 1 case was excluded for acute myocardial infarction.

16. Objective:To assess the early diagnosis of acute mesenteric artery embolism and the clinical outcome of embolectomy.

17. Objective To observe the efficacy of radical nephrectomy plus embolectomy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with renal vein or inferior vena cava involvement.

18. Objective To summary the experience of brachial arteriotomy with embolectomy to treat acute embolism of the upper extremities retrospectively and discuss the diagnosis and treatment of it.

19. Those patients who are a high risk and this can be defined by the presence of shock or hypotension, should receive thrombolysis or even embolectomy by surgery or sometimes intervention.